Sustainable Livelihood of Agriculture Dependent Rural Communities (SLADRC) under National Fund for Climate Change (NAFCC)
Department of Environment, Science Technology and Climate Change Government of Himachal Pradesh
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures, weather patterns, and rainfall caused by both natural processes and human activities. In recent decades, rising greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and unsustainable agricultural practices have accelerated global warming.
For farmers and rural communities, climate change is not just an environmental issue but a livelihood challenge—leading to uncertain rainfall, extreme heat, droughts, floods, and declining soil fertility. Understanding its causes, impacts, and solutions is the first step toward building resilience and securing sustainable livelihoods.
🌦️ Unpredictable rainfall reduces crop reliability.
🌡️ Extreme temperatures affect crop yields and livestock health.
💧 Water scarcity threatens irrigation and drinking needs.
🐝 Loss of biodiversity impacts pollination and pest control.
🌾 Decline in soil health reduces long-term productivity.
Building awareness helps farmers adopt climate-smart practices, diversify income sources, and plan better for future uncertainties.
Climate Knowledge & Networking helps decision-makers prepare for climate change by providing reliable information and connecting stakeholders. It includes tangible knowledge products such as emission scenarios, climate model outputs, and vulnerability assessments, as well as networks that make this data accessible and usable. Providers range from national research institutes and meteorological services to global platforms. For knowledge to be truly usable, it must match users’ needs, be clearly explained (including uncertainties), and shared through active dialogue between providers and users.
In a changing climate, we need usable climate knowledge and networking to support adaptive management and decision-making. ‘Adapt to what exactly?’ is the first question any one or a decision-maker may ask when faced with the need to prepare for the consequences of climate change. Without knowing the expected changes in climatic conditions, proactive and anticipatory adaptation approaches are difficult. We might identify no-regret/low-regret measures that are suitable to different climate change scenarios, but the more we know, the better our responses can be.
Tangible climate knowledge products range from global emission scenarios and climate model outputs to local impact and vulnerability assessment results. Generating these products requires data and information from various sectors of research. Climate knowledge products can describe historical, current and future climate conditions. They can entail future predictions and projections on monthly, seasonal or decadal timescales and their impact on natural and human systems. Climate networking can be understood as those activities that deal with research, study, generating and providing this knowledge to a wide range of users in order to support climate resilient development. As we are dealing with a rather new field of activity, the concept of climate services still needs to be defined more clearly in close collaboration with users.
With regards to providing climate change knowledge and networking, there is no long-standing, well-established tradition. Taking future climate developments into account is a rather new and fast-growing field of activities and actors. As there are various types of climate knowledge, there are various sources for support, ranging from national research institutes to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) to global and regional information platforms. Recently, a growing number of governments are starting to customise climate knowledge and target it to specific users based on their experience in weather forecasting.
In order to make a well-informed adaptation decision, decision-makers and their advisors have to make use of climate knowledge. The knowledge provider-user relationship is crucial here. Due to different perspectives, there is often a gap between what providers understand as useful information and what users recognise as usable. Knowledge providers may not completely know potential users’ decision-making processes and contexts, so sometimes the information that is produced remains unused. Or given their limited understanding of the matter, decision-makers might misinterpret climate knowledge and make the wrong decisions. Explaining the level of uncertainty associated with a particular product is also vital, and therefore the exchange and dialogue between the user and the provider side is of utmost importance.
Climate Knowledge & Networking helps decision-makers prepare for climate change by providing reliable information and connecting stakeholders. It includes tangible knowledge products such as emission scenarios, climate model outputs, and vulnerability assessments, as well as networks that make this data accessible and usable. Providers range from national research institutes and meteorological services to global platforms. For knowledge to be truly usable, it must match users’ needs, be clearly explained (including uncertainties), and shared through active dialogue between providers and users.
In a changing climate, we need usable climate knowledge and networking to support adaptive management and decision-making. ‘Adapt to what exactly?’ is the first question any one or a decision-maker may ask when faced with the need to prepare for the consequences of climate change. Without knowing the expected changes in climatic conditions, proactive and anticipatory adaptation approaches are difficult. We might identify no-regret/low-regret measures that are suitable to different climate change scenarios, but the more we know, the better our responses can be.
Tangible climate knowledge products range from global emission scenarios and climate model outputs to local impact and vulnerability assessment results. Generating these products requires data and information from various sectors of research. Climate knowledge products can describe historical, current and future climate conditions. They can entail future predictions and projections on monthly, seasonal or decadal timescales and their impact on natural and human systems. Climate networking can be understood as those activities that deal with research, study, generating and providing this knowledge to a wide range of users in order to support climate resilient development. As we are dealing with a rather new field of activity, the concept of climate services still needs to be defined more clearly in close collaboration with users.
With regards to providing climate change knowledge and networking, there is no long-standing, well-established tradition. Taking future climate developments into account is a rather new and fast-growing field of activities and actors. As there are various types of climate knowledge, there are various sources for support, ranging from national research institutes to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) to global and regional information platforms. Recently, a growing number of governments are starting to customise climate knowledge and target it to specific users based on their experience in weather forecasting.
In order to make a well-informed adaptation decision, decision-makers and their advisors have to make use of climate knowledge. The knowledge provider-user relationship is crucial here. Due to different perspectives, there is often a gap between what providers understand as useful information and what users recognise as usable. Knowledge providers may not completely know potential users’ decision-making processes and contexts, so sometimes the information that is produced remains unused. Or given their limited understanding of the matter, decision-makers might misinterpret climate knowledge and make the wrong decisions. Explaining the level of uncertainty associated with a particular product is also vital, and therefore the exchange and dialogue between the user and the provider side is of utmost importance.
Climate Knowledge & Networking helps decision-makers prepare for climate change by providing reliable information and connecting stakeholders. It includes tangible knowledge products such as emission scenarios, climate model outputs, and vulnerability assessments, as well as networks that make this data accessible and usable. Providers range from national research institutes and meteorological services to global platforms. For knowledge to be truly usable, it must match users’ needs, be clearly explained (including uncertainties), and shared through active dialogue between providers and users.
In a changing climate, we need usable climate knowledge and networking to support adaptive management and decision-making. ‘Adapt to what exactly?’ is the first question any one or a decision-maker may ask when faced with the need to prepare for the consequences of climate change. Without knowing the expected changes in climatic conditions, proactive and anticipatory adaptation approaches are difficult. We might identify no-regret/low-regret measures that are suitable to different climate change scenarios, but the more we know, the better our responses can be.
Tangible climate knowledge products range from global emission scenarios and climate model outputs to local impact and vulnerability assessment results. Generating these products requires data and information from various sectors of research. Climate knowledge products can describe historical, current and future climate conditions. They can entail future predictions and projections on monthly, seasonal or decadal timescales and their impact on natural and human systems. Climate networking can be understood as those activities that deal with research, study, generating and providing this knowledge to a wide range of users in order to support climate resilient development. As we are dealing with a rather new field of activity, the concept of climate services still needs to be defined more clearly in close collaboration with users.
With regards to providing climate change knowledge and networking, there is no long-standing, well-established tradition. Taking future climate developments into account is a rather new and fast-growing field of activities and actors. As there are various types of climate knowledge, there are various sources for support, ranging from national research institutes to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) to global and regional information platforms. Recently, a growing number of governments are starting to customise climate knowledge and target it to specific users based on their experience in weather forecasting.
In order to make a well-informed adaptation decision, decision-makers and their advisors have to make use of climate knowledge. The knowledge provider-user relationship is crucial here. Due to different perspectives, there is often a gap between what providers understand as useful information and what users recognise as usable. Knowledge providers may not completely know potential users’ decision-making processes and contexts, so sometimes the information that is produced remains unused. Or given their limited understanding of the matter, decision-makers might misinterpret climate knowledge and make the wrong decisions. Explaining the level of uncertainty associated with a particular product is also vital, and therefore the exchange and dialogue between the user and the provider side is of utmost importance.
Climate Knowledge & Networking helps decision-makers prepare for climate change by providing reliable information and connecting stakeholders. It includes tangible knowledge products such as emission scenarios, climate model outputs, and vulnerability assessments, as well as networks that make this data accessible and usable. Providers range from national research institutes and meteorological services to global platforms. For knowledge to be truly usable, it must match users’ needs, be clearly explained (including uncertainties), and shared through active dialogue between providers and users.
In a changing climate, we need usable climate knowledge and networking to support adaptive management and decision-making. ‘Adapt to what exactly?’ is the first question any one or a decision-maker may ask when faced with the need to prepare for the consequences of climate change. Without knowing the expected changes in climatic conditions, proactive and anticipatory adaptation approaches are difficult. We might identify no-regret/low-regret measures that are suitable to different climate change scenarios, but the more we know, the better our responses can be.
Tangible climate knowledge products range from global emission scenarios and climate model outputs to local impact and vulnerability assessment results. Generating these products requires data and information from various sectors of research. Climate knowledge products can describe historical, current and future climate conditions. They can entail future predictions and projections on monthly, seasonal or decadal timescales and their impact on natural and human systems. Climate networking can be understood as those activities that deal with research, study, generating and providing this knowledge to a wide range of users in order to support climate resilient development. As we are dealing with a rather new field of activity, the concept of climate services still needs to be defined more clearly in close collaboration with users.
With regards to providing climate change knowledge and networking, there is no long-standing, well-established tradition. Taking future climate developments into account is a rather new and fast-growing field of activities and actors. As there are various types of climate knowledge, there are various sources for support, ranging from national research institutes to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) to global and regional information platforms. Recently, a growing number of governments are starting to customise climate knowledge and target it to specific users based on their experience in weather forecasting.
In order to make a well-informed adaptation decision, decision-makers and their advisors have to make use of climate knowledge. The knowledge provider-user relationship is crucial here. Due to different perspectives, there is often a gap between what providers understand as useful information and what users recognise as usable. Knowledge providers may not completely know potential users’ decision-making processes and contexts, so sometimes the information that is produced remains unused. Or given their limited understanding of the matter, decision-makers might misinterpret climate knowledge and make the wrong decisions. Explaining the level of uncertainty associated with a particular product is also vital, and therefore the exchange and dialogue between the user and the provider side is of utmost importance.
Climate Knowledge & Networking helps decision-makers prepare for climate change by providing reliable information and connecting stakeholders. It includes tangible knowledge products such as emission scenarios, climate model outputs, and vulnerability assessments, as well as networks that make this data accessible and usable. Providers range from national research institutes and meteorological services to global platforms. For knowledge to be truly usable, it must match users’ needs, be clearly explained (including uncertainties), and shared through active dialogue between providers and users.
In a changing climate, we need usable climate knowledge and networking to support adaptive management and decision-making. ‘Adapt to what exactly?’ is the first question any one or a decision-maker may ask when faced with the need to prepare for the consequences of climate change. Without knowing the expected changes in climatic conditions, proactive and anticipatory adaptation approaches are difficult. We might identify no-regret/low-regret measures that are suitable to different climate change scenarios, but the more we know, the better our responses can be.
Tangible climate knowledge products range from global emission scenarios and climate model outputs to local impact and vulnerability assessment results. Generating these products requires data and information from various sectors of research. Climate knowledge products can describe historical, current and future climate conditions. They can entail future predictions and projections on monthly, seasonal or decadal timescales and their impact on natural and human systems. Climate networking can be understood as those activities that deal with research, study, generating and providing this knowledge to a wide range of users in order to support climate resilient development. As we are dealing with a rather new field of activity, the concept of climate services still needs to be defined more clearly in close collaboration with users.
With regards to providing climate change knowledge and networking, there is no long-standing, well-established tradition. Taking future climate developments into account is a rather new and fast-growing field of activities and actors. As there are various types of climate knowledge, there are various sources for support, ranging from national research institutes to National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) to global and regional information platforms. Recently, a growing number of governments are starting to customise climate knowledge and target it to specific users based on their experience in weather forecasting.
In order to make a well-informed adaptation decision, decision-makers and their advisors have to make use of climate knowledge. The knowledge provider-user relationship is crucial here. Due to different perspectives, there is often a gap between what providers understand as useful information and what users recognise as usable. Knowledge providers may not completely know potential users’ decision-making processes and contexts, so sometimes the information that is produced remains unused. Or given their limited understanding of the matter, decision-makers might misinterpret climate knowledge and make the wrong decisions. Explaining the level of uncertainty associated with a particular product is also vital, and therefore the exchange and dialogue between the user and the provider side is of utmost importance.